Which statement about infill development is NOT a typical benefit?

Which statement about infill development is NOT a typical benefit?

• A. Development on vacant or underused parcels within existing urban areas.
• B. Reduces sprawl.
• C. Preserves greenfield land.
• D. Expands development onto undeveloped greenfield sites.

Answer: (D)

Infill development focuses growth on vacant or underused parcels within existing urban areas. This approach is usually beneficial because it makes use of already developed infrastructure, services, and neighborhoods, which can support more efficient transit and daily life. It also helps curb suburban sprawl by concentrating new development where land is already urbanized, and it preserves greenfield land by avoiding new development on undeveloped outskirts. The statement about expanding development onto undeveloped greenfield sites is not a typical benefit of infill. That describes greenfield or outward expansion, which is essentially the opposite of infill.

Infill development focuses growth on vacant or underused parcels within existing urban areas. This approach is usually beneficial because it makes use of already developed infrastructure, services, and neighborhoods, which can support more efficient transit and daily life. It also helps curb suburban sprawl by concentrating new development where land is already urbanized, and it preserves greenfield land by avoiding new development on undeveloped outskirts.

The statement about expanding development onto undeveloped greenfield sites is not a typical benefit of infill. That describes greenfield or outward expansion, which is essentially the opposite of infill.